Your Planet Sustainable?Your Tribe Harmonious?Your Life Vibrant?
Future Proof Ideas since 2005, by Erwin van Lun

Computer reacts to emotions

Trung Bui, a research assistant at University Twente has developed a system that can deal with the user's emotions. To illustrate the effectiveness Bui applied it to a navigational system for relief workers which takes into account the stress experienced by a user. The navigational system receives input from a loose 'stressmodule' which measures the relief worker's stress levels. When communicating with the user, the system will take this into account. In a situation wherein the user's stress levels are heightened, for example, the system will take into account the fact that the user is more prone to make mistakes and will ask for confirmation more often.

The annoying thing about human emotions is that they’re not always equally clear, especially for a computer. Raising one’s voice, for example can be a sign of enthusiasm, but also one of rage. People are trained to combine different kinds of (uncertain) information and drawing the right conclusions based on them. This handling of uncertainties, however, is difficult to program into a computer program.

For this Bui adopts a mathematical formula designed in the 60’s to drive factory processes: the Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP). He demonstrated that this technique is suitable for integrating the emotions of the user into a dialogue system. The POMDP-technology can deal with uncertainties. The method performs, as long as it’s tested with small-scale dialogue problems, better than previous systems. Larger problems, however, require too much computing power.

That’s why Bui developed a hybrid strategy. This combines the Dynamic Decision Network (DDN) with POMDP. In contrast to POMDP’s, DDN-POMDP’s split the dialogue systems on two levels. They balance looking far ahead and attainability where computing power is concerned.

Future Vision by Erwin Van Lun on this article

Step by step we learn to react better and better to humans. First to typing, then clicking, by now a little better to our voice, but this kind of development shows that it’s definitely not going to stay like this. Eventually ‘listening’, ‘observing’, will be the most normal thing in the world for brands.

Related postings

Archive

Twitter
RSS